The existing studies show zero high dating anywhere between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller ainsi que al

The existing studies show zero high dating anywhere between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller ainsi que al

Players

There little armenia had been 437 (270 people) participants, who had been recruited through in public places available networks. Their indicate years are 23 many years (SD = 5.96). Members have been questioned doing a couple of surveys the that aren’t relevant on the most recent data. All the victims gave the told consent towards discharge of its decide to try scores to own research aim, as well as was indeed given views towards standard outcome of the research. The newest dataset analysed in current studies is available from the

Tips

Vulnerable narcissism is actually measured with the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale because of the Hendin and you will Cheek (1997) from the Shine translation (discover Czarna mais aussi al. 2014). It includes 10 points having a beneficial Likert-like response size from one (strongly differ) in order to 5 (highly consent).

Grandiose narcissism was reviewed towards the confirmed Gloss version (Bazinska and you can Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your own Narcissistic Personality Index (Raskin and you can Hall 1979). Stuff have been chosen basing into the basis investigation (loadings surpassing .40) and you may represented the following subscales of one’s NPI: Authority (11 products), Self-Sufficiency (7), Mirror (5), and you may Exhibitionism (11). Participants ranked their standard of approval each and every declaration having fun with an effective Likert-method of effect structure, in one (doesn’t affect me personally) in order to 5 (applies to me personally). The sum of activities produces a list away from grandiose narcissism. This has been shown recently that Likert structure NPI exhibits similar make legitimacy and you will a bit increased accuracy on the completely new pushed-selection format (Miller mais aussi al. 2018a).

The big Four try examined that have Polish variation (Strus et al. 2014) of the Worldwide Character Goods Pool – Huge Five Factor Level (BFAS; DeYoung ainsi que al. 2007). This might be an one hundred-items measure of trait domains (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Transparency/Intellect) additionally the a couple of lower-order regions of for each domain (Volatility, Withdrawal, Mercy, Complimentary, Industriousness, Orderliness, Passion, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and Openness). Members are asked so you’re able to rates simply how much the brand new comments are related in it on the a good Likert-particular size, from 1 (highly disagree) to help you 5 (highly agree).

Efficiency

Basic, we tested the correlations ranging from several versions off narcissism and identity traits in addition to domain names and you can factors (Dining table 1). Each other kind of narcissism correlated with personality traits during the an identical cure for earlier in the day lookup (e.grams. Miller ainsi que al. 2011). Specifically, vulnerable narcissism is actually surely correlated with Neuroticism, and you will adversely from the Agreeableness and you will Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism synchronised certainly that have Extraversion, Openness/Intellect and you can Conscientiousness, and you may negatively with Neuroticism and Agreeableness.

Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).

القائمة